BOLDEN v. McCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY LLC, 14-1319. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20140930143
Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Jermaine Bolden appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider and amend his complaint alleging violations of consumer protection laws. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolden v. McCabe, No. 8:13-cv-01265-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Jermaine Bolden appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider and amend his complaint alleging violations of consumer protection laws. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolden v. McCabe, No. 8:13-cv-01265-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Jermaine Bolden appeals the district court's order denying his motion to reconsider and amend his complaint alleging violations of consumer protection laws. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bolden v. McCabe, No. 8:13-cv-01265-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 13, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
