U.S. v. Victoriano, 8:19CR129. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190702b52
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [28]. Counsel received additional voluminous discovery in this matter and requests additional time to review it before proceeding to trial. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [28] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for July 9, 2019, is continued to August 27, 2019. 2. In accordance with 1
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [28]. Counsel received additional voluminous discovery in this matter and requests additional time to review it before proceeding to trial. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [28] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for July 9, 2019, is continued to August 27, 2019. 2. In accordance with 18..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [28]. Counsel received additional voluminous discovery in this matter and requests additional time to review it before proceeding to trial. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [28] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for July 9, 2019, is continued to August 27, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and August 27, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
