United States v. Rasmussen, CR-19-160-C. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20200115j00
Visitors: 25
Filed: Jan. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER ROBIN J. CAUTHRON , District Judge . Defendant argues that Plaintiff should be prevented from offering "misleading testimony" about statements made during his interrogation on May 6, 2019. Defendant assets testimony may be offered regarding an admission or confession he made about the imitation firearm allegedly used in the robbery of the Community Bank of Oklahoma in Chickasha, Oklahoma. The Court finds Defendant's Motion too vague to permit a ruling prior to trial. To the extent Def
Summary: ORDER ROBIN J. CAUTHRON , District Judge . Defendant argues that Plaintiff should be prevented from offering "misleading testimony" about statements made during his interrogation on May 6, 2019. Defendant assets testimony may be offered regarding an admission or confession he made about the imitation firearm allegedly used in the robbery of the Community Bank of Oklahoma in Chickasha, Oklahoma. The Court finds Defendant's Motion too vague to permit a ruling prior to trial. To the extent Defe..
More
ORDER
ROBIN J. CAUTHRON, District Judge.
Defendant argues that Plaintiff should be prevented from offering "misleading testimony" about statements made during his interrogation on May 6, 2019. Defendant assets testimony may be offered regarding an admission or confession he made about the imitation firearm allegedly used in the robbery of the Community Bank of Oklahoma in Chickasha, Oklahoma. The Court finds Defendant's Motion too vague to permit a ruling prior to trial. To the extent Defendant believes improper evidence or testimony is offered at trial, the Court is confident in counsel's ability to raise a timely and proper objection.
Accordingly, Defendant's Motion in Limine Re: Misleading Testimony (Dkt. No. 53) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle