Estes v. Berryhill, 5:16CV232. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20180611832
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fee Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) (# 17). Plaintiff's motion must be denied because his counsel failed to demonstrate that he conferred with opposing counsel. See LCvR 7.1(b) ("Civil motions must show that counsel have conferred and attempted in good faith to resolve areas of disagreement, or describe the timely attempts of the movant to confer with opposing counsel."). Conse
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fee Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2412(d) (# 17). Plaintiff's motion must be denied because his counsel failed to demonstrate that he conferred with opposing counsel. See LCvR 7.1(b) ("Civil motions must show that counsel have conferred and attempted in good faith to resolve areas of disagreement, or describe the timely attempts of the movant to confer with opposing counsel."). Conseq..
More
ORDER
DENNIS L. HOWELL, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fee Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (# 17). Plaintiff's motion must be denied because his counsel failed to demonstrate that he conferred with opposing counsel. See LCvR 7.1(b) ("Civil motions must show that counsel have conferred and attempted in good faith to resolve areas of disagreement, or describe the timely attempts of the movant to confer with opposing counsel."). Consequently, Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fee Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (# 17) is DENIED without prejudice to renew. See id. ("A motion that fails to show that the parties have properly conferred or attempted to confer may be summarily denied.").
Source: Leagle
