NEAL v. THOMSON PLASTICS, INC., CV 113-076. (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia
Number: infdco20140919843
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER RANDAL HALL, District Judge. Plaintiff has failed to file a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23), and the Court is reluctant to rule on the motion without first hearing from Plaintiff. Under Local Rule 7.5, failure to respond to a motion generally indicates that the motion is unopposed. Nevertheless, the Court recognizes that Plaintiff is acting pro se in this case and that Defendant's motion is dispositive in nature. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to
Summary: ORDER RANDAL HALL, District Judge. Plaintiff has failed to file a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23), and the Court is reluctant to rule on the motion without first hearing from Plaintiff. Under Local Rule 7.5, failure to respond to a motion generally indicates that the motion is unopposed. Nevertheless, the Court recognizes that Plaintiff is acting pro se in this case and that Defendant's motion is dispositive in nature. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to f..
More
ORDER
RANDAL HALL, District Judge.
Plaintiff has failed to file a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23), and the Court is reluctant to rule on the motion without first hearing from Plaintiff. Under Local Rule 7.5, failure to respond to a motion generally indicates that the motion is unopposed. Nevertheless, the Court recognizes that Plaintiff is acting pro se in this case and that Defendant's motion is dispositive in nature. Therefore, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file a response to the motion for summary judgment by 5:00 PM on OCTOBER 2, 2014. Thereafter, the Court will rule on the motion, and if Plaintiff still fails to respond, the Court will deem the motion unopposed. See LR 7.5, SDGa.
Source: Leagle
