GARFIELD v. McLAUGHLIN, 09-11617-GAO (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20120314a13
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER LEO T. SOROKIN, Magistrate Judge. On February 22, 2012, in case number 09-cv011617, Defendant Paul Carpenter filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Plaintiff (Docket #94) and a Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Answers to Interrogatories (Docket #95). On February 22, 2012, in case number 10-cv-10197, Defendant Mark Gibbons filed a Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Answers to Interrogatories (Docket #33) and a Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Plaintiff (Docket #34). Plai
Summary: ORDER LEO T. SOROKIN, Magistrate Judge. On February 22, 2012, in case number 09-cv011617, Defendant Paul Carpenter filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Plaintiff (Docket #94) and a Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Answers to Interrogatories (Docket #95). On February 22, 2012, in case number 10-cv-10197, Defendant Mark Gibbons filed a Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Answers to Interrogatories (Docket #33) and a Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Plaintiff (Docket #34). Plain..
More
ORDER
LEO T. SOROKIN, Magistrate Judge.
On February 22, 2012, in case number 09-cv011617, Defendant Paul Carpenter filed a Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Plaintiff (Docket #94) and a Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Answers to Interrogatories (Docket #95). On February 22, 2012, in case number 10-cv-10197, Defendant Mark Gibbons filed a Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Answers to Interrogatories (Docket #33) and a Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Plaintiff (Docket #34). Plaintiff has not filed a response to any of these motions. At the last status conference, Plaintiff indicated that he would be on trial for violation of a restraining order in another matter on January 26, 2012, and that he faced a two-and-a-half year jail sentence if convicted.
The Court hereby orders Defendants Paul Carpenter and Mark Gibbons to file a report with this Court by March 20, 2012, indicating how they served Plaintiff and whether they believe Plaintiff received the Motions.
Source: Leagle