Filed: Jun. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER CARL J. BARBIER, District Judge. The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc. 54), and Plaintiff's Objections (Rec. Doc. 55), hereby APPROVES the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pla
Summary: ORDER CARL J. BARBIER, District Judge. The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc. 54), and Plaintiff's Objections (Rec. Doc. 55), hereby APPROVES the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plai..
More
ORDER
CARL J. BARBIER, District Judge.
The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc. 54), and Plaintiff's Objections (Rec. Doc. 55), hereby APPROVES the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and adopts it as its opinion in this matter.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants EMT Bruce Forbes, Warden Robert Tanner, Major Michael Harrell, Operations Chief Jeffrey Travis, Secretary James LeBlanc, Deputy Warden Keith Bickham, Captain Ronnie Seal, Corrections Sergeant Master Douglas Brooks, Corrections Sergeant Master Jonathan Tynes, and Corrections Sergeant Master Larry Weary are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous for failing to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted, or else for prescription under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Defendants Based on Qualified Immunity (Rec. Doc. 23) and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Parties Based on Prescription (Rec. Doc. 24) are hereby DENIED AS MOOT.
