SMITH v. ADRAY, 12-14009. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130529e11
Visitors: 24
Filed: May 28, 2013
Latest Update: May 28, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. This matter case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles Binder pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his March 27, 2013 report, the magistrate judge recommends that this court grant Defendant Adray's motion for summary judgment and dismiss the remaining John Doe Defendants. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal righ
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. This matter case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles Binder pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his March 27, 2013 report, the magistrate judge recommends that this court grant Defendant Adray's motion for summary judgment and dismiss the remaining John Doe Defendants. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal right..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
This matter case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles Binder pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his March 27, 2013 report, the magistrate judge recommends that this court grant Defendant Adray's motion for summary judgment and dismiss the remaining John Doe Defendants. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this Order.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendant Adray's motion for summary judgment [Dkt. # 11] is GRANTED, and the Doe Defendants 1-5 are sua sponte DISMISSED.
A separate judgment will issue closing this case.
FootNotes
1. The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Source: Leagle
