WEATHERSPOON v. DINSA, 14-12756. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150805865
Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Morris Weatherspoon, who is proceeding pro se in this prisoner civil rights case, has filed the following motions: —Motion to dismiss Defendant Potts' summary judgment motion [Doc. #26]. —Motion to dismiss Defendant McGuire's summary judgment motion [Doc. #27]. —Motion to dismiss Defendant Kornowski's summary judgment motion [Doc. #28]. —Motion to Dismiss Defendant Dinsa' summary judgment motion [Doc. #29]. —Motion to Dismiss Defe
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Morris Weatherspoon, who is proceeding pro se in this prisoner civil rights case, has filed the following motions: —Motion to dismiss Defendant Potts' summary judgment motion [Doc. #26]. —Motion to dismiss Defendant McGuire's summary judgment motion [Doc. #27]. —Motion to dismiss Defendant Kornowski's summary judgment motion [Doc. #28]. —Motion to Dismiss Defendant Dinsa' summary judgment motion [Doc. #29]. —Motion to Dismiss Defen..
More
ORDER
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Morris Weatherspoon, who is proceeding pro se in this prisoner civil rights case, has filed the following motions:
—Motion to dismiss Defendant Potts' summary judgment motion [Doc. #26].
—Motion to dismiss Defendant McGuire's summary judgment motion [Doc. #27].
—Motion to dismiss Defendant Kornowski's summary judgment motion [Doc. #28].
—Motion to Dismiss Defendant Dinsa' summary judgment motion [Doc. #29].
—Motion to Dismiss Defendant Conrad's summary judgment motion [Doc. #30].
—Motion to Deny Defendants' motion to dismiss on grounds of qualified immunity [Doc. #31].
While characterized as "motions to dismiss motions," Plaintiff's filings are, in effect, responses to the Defendants' motions for summary judgment [Doc. #18 and #21]. I construed them as such, and fully considered the arguments contained therein in preparing my Report and Recommendation to grant the Defendants' motions.
However, to the extent that the Plaintiff's motions [Doc. #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, and #31] request that the Defendants' summary judgment motions be dismissed or stricken, they are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle