Bradley v. Parker, 2:18-CV-12202-TGB. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190820d81
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TERRENCE G. BERG , District Judge This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis's July 19, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17) recommending dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice as to defendants Parker and State Farm, and without prejudice as to defendant Lull. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either p
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT TERRENCE G. BERG , District Judge This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis's July 19, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17) recommending dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice as to defendants Parker and State Farm, and without prejudice as to defendant Lull. The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either pa..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
TERRENCE G. BERG, District Judge
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis's July 19, 2019 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 17) recommending dismissal of Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice as to defendants Parker and State Farm, and without prejudice as to defendant Lull.
The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The law provides that either party may serve and file written objections "[w]ithin fourteen days after being served with a copy" of a report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The district court will make a "de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made." Id. Where, as here, neither party objects to the report, the district court is not obligated to independently review the record. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation of July 19, 2019 as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Davis's Report and Recommendation of July 19, 2019 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that claims against Defendants Parker and State Farm are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and claims against Defendant Lull are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
