PATRICK J. DUGGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit against Defendants on October 18, 2012, alleging violations of his Eighth Amendment rights while he was a Michigan Department of Corrections' inmate. On January 4, 2013, Defendant Mitchell filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. On May 2, 2013, Defendant Johnson filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). This Court has referred the matter to Magistrate Judge Charles Binder for all pretrial proceedings, including a report and recommendation ("R&R") on all dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (ECF No. 16.) On June 27, 2013, Magistrate Judge Binder issued his R&R recommending that this Court grant Defendants' motions. (ECF No. 31.)
In his R&R, Magistrate Judge Binder applies the standard for review under Rule 12(b)(6) and concludes that Plaintiff fails to state a viable Eighth Amendment claim. (Id. at 6-8.) At the conclusion of his R&R, Magistrate Judge Binder advises the parties that they may object to and seek review of the R&R within fourteen days of service upon them. (Id. at 9.) He further specifically advises the parties that "[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right to appeal." (Id. at 9.) Neither party filed objections to the R&R.
The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Binder. The Court therefore adopts the R&R.
Accordingly,