Wilson v. Florida Marine Transporters, LLC, 18-13952. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20191104d14
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER & REASONS BARRY W. ASHE , District Judge . Before the Court is a motion by defendant Warren Paving, Inc. for summary judgment to dismiss plaintiff Richie Wilson's claims against it. 1 In response to the motion, Wilson judicially admits that he is abandoning his claims against Warren Paving. 2 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Warren Paving, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment to dismiss Wilson's claims against it (R. Doc. 107) is GRANTED, and Wilson's claims against Warren Paving are
Summary: ORDER & REASONS BARRY W. ASHE , District Judge . Before the Court is a motion by defendant Warren Paving, Inc. for summary judgment to dismiss plaintiff Richie Wilson's claims against it. 1 In response to the motion, Wilson judicially admits that he is abandoning his claims against Warren Paving. 2 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Warren Paving, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment to dismiss Wilson's claims against it (R. Doc. 107) is GRANTED, and Wilson's claims against Warren Paving are ..
More
ORDER & REASONS
BARRY W. ASHE, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion by defendant Warren Paving, Inc. for summary judgment to dismiss plaintiff Richie Wilson's claims against it.1 In response to the motion, Wilson judicially admits that he is abandoning his claims against Warren Paving.2 Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Warren Paving, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment to dismiss Wilson's claims against it (R. Doc. 107) is GRANTED, and Wilson's claims against Warren Paving are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.3
FootNotes
1. R. Doc. 107.
2. R. Doc. 116.
3. Florida Marine Transporters, LLC, PBC Management, LLC, and FMT Industries, LLC (collectively, the "FMT entities") also filed an opposition to the motion, which the Court has considered. R. Doc. 122. However, Warren Paving's motion does not seek dismissal of the cross-claim brought by the FMT entities. As a result, this Order & Reasons does not apply to such claims, nor constitute a finding that Warren Paving was not at fault for Wilson's accident. Rather, this Order & Reasons simply dismisses Wilson's claims against Warren Paving as abandoned.
Source: Leagle
