Filed: Oct. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: 15-1518 United States v. Jones UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 3rd day of October, two thousand sixteen. Before: John M. Walker, Jr., Guido Calabresi, Peter W. Hall, Circuit Judges. _ United States of America, ORDER Appellee, Docket No. 15-1518 v. Corey Jones, Defendant - Appellant. _ It is he
Summary: 15-1518 United States v. Jones UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 3rd day of October, two thousand sixteen. Before: John M. Walker, Jr., Guido Calabresi, Peter W. Hall, Circuit Judges. _ United States of America, ORDER Appellee, Docket No. 15-1518 v. Corey Jones, Defendant - Appellant. _ It is her..
More
15-1518 United States v. Jones UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 3rd day of October, two thousand sixteen. Before: John M. Walker, Jr., Guido Calabresi, Peter W. Hall, Circuit Judges. _______________________________ United States of America, ORDER Appellee, Docket No. 15-1518 v. Corey Jones, Defendant - Appellant. ________________________________ It is hereby ORDERED that, pending the Supreme Court’s disposition in Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544, this Court’s opinion, issued on July 21, 2016, is VACATED and Appellee’s petition for rehearing and for rehearing en banc is held in abeyance. Following the disposition in Beckles, Appellee will be permitted to re-file the petition for rehearing, which may include arguments based on the decision in Beckles, and Appellant will be permitted to file a response. For the Court: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
