Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CRAWFORD v. NIELSEN, 1:10-cv-1101. (2012)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20120124854 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jan. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER JANET T. NEFF, District Judge. This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on December 29, 2011, recommending that this Court grant Defendants' motion and terminate this matter. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY
More

ORDER

JANET T. NEFF, District Judge.

This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on December 29, 2011, recommending that this Court grant Defendants' motion and terminate this matter. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt 31) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt 23) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).

A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer