GREER v. SCUTT, 11-12745. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130912973
Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2013
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA, District Judge. Before the court is a report and recommendation to deny Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, filed December 14, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives. Petitioner filed a 10-page objection to the report and recommendation on January 16, 2013. This Court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is mad
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA, District Judge. Before the court is a report and recommendation to deny Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, filed December 14, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives. Petitioner filed a 10-page objection to the report and recommendation on January 16, 2013. This Court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
JOHN CORBETT O'MEARA, District Judge.
Before the court is a report and recommendation to deny Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, filed December 14, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives. Petitioner filed a 10-page objection to the report and recommendation on January 16, 2013.
This Court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court "may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." Id.
Having reviewed the entire record, it is hereby ORDERED that the report and recommendation is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this court; and Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
