ADAMS v. U.S., 2:05-cr-00008-GZS (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20170414b92
Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 69) filed March 16, 2017, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) That an evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing 2255 cases; (2) It is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (ECF N
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 69) filed March 16, 2017, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) That an evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing 2255 cases; (2) It is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 69) filed March 16, 2017, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:
(1) That an evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing §2255 cases;
(2) It is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (ECF No. 57) is DENIED;
(3) It is ORDERED that a certificate of appealability shall be DENIED pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing §2255 cases.
Source: Leagle
