MOORE v. WARREN, 13-CV-11831-DT. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150224c02
Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his reports filed on November 17, 2014, the magistrate judge recommended that this court grant Defendant DeAngelo's Motion for Partial Dismissal and Summary Judgment and grant Defendant's Claire Pei's Motion for Summary Judgment. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge. This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his reports filed on November 17, 2014, the magistrate judge recommended that this court grant Defendant DeAngelo's Motion for Partial Dismissal and Summary Judgment and grant Defendant's Claire Pei's Motion for Summary Judgment. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ROBERT H. CLELAND, District Judge.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate David R. Grand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 72.1. In his reports filed on November 17, 2014, the magistrate judge recommended that this court grant Defendant DeAngelo's Motion for Partial Dismissal and Summary Judgment and grant Defendant's Claire Pei's Motion for Summary Judgment. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(C), thus further appeal rights are waived.1
Having reviewed the file and the report, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and ADOPTS the same for purposes of this Order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's "Report and Recommendation", Defendant Dr.Claire Pei's Motion for Summary Judgment [ Dkt # 52] and Defendant Jodi DeAngelo's Motion for Partial Dismissal and Summary Judgment [Dkt # 56] are GRANTED.
FootNotes
1. The failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the court from its duty to independently review the motion. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
Source: Leagle
