Garland v. Schindler Elevator Corp., 19-12854. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20200207c60
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . On December 5, 2019, Plaintiff's attorney Howard J. Radner filed a motion to withdraw in this case. (ECF No. 10.) The Court granted Attorney Radner's motion on December 9, 2019. (ECF No. 12.) The Court's December 9 Order stayed proceedings in this case for 30 days to allow Plaintiff to find new counsel. ( Id. ) If Plaintiff could not find new counsel, Plaintiff was ordered to notify the cour
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE JUDITH E. LEVY , District Judge . On December 5, 2019, Plaintiff's attorney Howard J. Radner filed a motion to withdraw in this case. (ECF No. 10.) The Court granted Attorney Radner's motion on December 9, 2019. (ECF No. 12.) The Court's December 9 Order stayed proceedings in this case for 30 days to allow Plaintiff to find new counsel. ( Id. ) If Plaintiff could not find new counsel, Plaintiff was ordered to notify the court..
More
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
JUDITH E. LEVY, District Judge.
On December 5, 2019, Plaintiff's attorney Howard J. Radner filed a motion to withdraw in this case. (ECF No. 10.) The Court granted Attorney Radner's motion on December 9, 2019. (ECF No. 12.)
The Court's December 9 Order stayed proceedings in this case for 30 days to allow Plaintiff to find new counsel. (Id.) If Plaintiff could not find new counsel, Plaintiff was ordered to notify the court on or before January 10, 2020 whether she wished to proceed without counsel or voluntarily dismiss her case. (Id.) On January 16, 2020, the Court issued a final Order for Plaintiff to advise the Court as to the status of her representation no later than January 30, 2020, or face dismissal for failure to prosecute her case. (ECF No. 14.)
To date, Plaintiff has not responded to any of the Court's Orders and there have been no attorney appearances in this case since Mr. Radner's withdrawal.
Accordingly, pursuant to Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 41.2, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
