RODRIGUEZ v. THOMAS, 1:14-CV-1121. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20151007e53
Visitors: 22
Filed: Sep. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER YVETTE KANE , District Judge . NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. No. 10) and Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 11), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) The Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED; and 2) The Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED. This court's previous order dated January 14, 201
Summary: ORDER YVETTE KANE , District Judge . NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. No. 10) and Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 11), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) The Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED; and 2) The Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED. This court's previous order dated January 14, 2015..
More
ORDER
YVETTE KANE, District Judge.
NOW, THEREFORE, THIS 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. No. 10) and Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 11), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1) The Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED; and
2) The Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED. This court's previous order dated January 14, 2015 (Doc. No. 9) will remain unchanged.
Source: Leagle
