Miller v. Saul, 5:19-cv-00060-FDW-DSC (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20200228g44
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2020
Summary: CONSENT ORDER DAVID S. CAYER , Magistrate Judge . This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order, and it appearing that the parties have agreed that Plaintiff Troy O. Miller be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,590.00 in full and final settlement of attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. 2412(d). Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), these EAJA fe
Summary: CONSENT ORDER DAVID S. CAYER , Magistrate Judge . This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order, and it appearing that the parties have agreed that Plaintiff Troy O. Miller be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,590.00 in full and final settlement of attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. 2412(d). Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), these EAJA fee..
More
CONSENT ORDER
DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge.
This action being submitted to the Court for entry of a Consent Order, and it appearing that the parties have agreed that Plaintiff Troy O. Miller be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,590.00 in full and final settlement of attorney fees and costs arising under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), these EAJA fees are payable to Plaintiff as the prevailing party, and are subject to offset through the Treasury Department's Offset Program to satisfy any pre-existing debt Plaintiff may owe to the Federal Government. If, subsequent to entry of the Consent Order, the Commissioner determines that Plaintiff owes no debt to the Government that would subject this award of attorney fees to offset, the Commissioner may honor Plaintiff's signed assignment of EAJA fees providing for payment of the subject fees to Plaintiff's Counsel, rather than to Plaintiff. If such a debt is present, then any remaining fee after offset will be payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's Counsel.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Commissioner pay the sum of $3,590.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims arising under EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and upon the payment of such sum this case is dismissed with prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
