Clarity Solution Group, LLC v. VisionPRO, LLC, 18-14088. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190613c33
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 18) AVERN COHN , District Judge . This is a business dispute. Plaintiff Clarity Solution Group, LLC d/b/a/Clarity Insights (Clarity) is suing defendants VisionPRO, LLC f/k/a/Prime Workforce Solutions LLC and Vision Information Technologies. The complaint asserts the following claims: Count I breach of contract Count II account stated Count III unjust enrichment Count IV statutory embezzlement Count V injunctive relief In br
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 18) AVERN COHN , District Judge . This is a business dispute. Plaintiff Clarity Solution Group, LLC d/b/a/Clarity Insights (Clarity) is suing defendants VisionPRO, LLC f/k/a/Prime Workforce Solutions LLC and Vision Information Technologies. The complaint asserts the following claims: Count I breach of contract Count II account stated Count III unjust enrichment Count IV statutory embezzlement Count V injunctive relief In bro..
More
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 18)
AVERN COHN, District Judge.
This is a business dispute. Plaintiff Clarity Solution Group, LLC d/b/a/Clarity Insights (Clarity) is suing defendants VisionPRO, LLC f/k/a/Prime Workforce Solutions LLC and Vision Information Technologies. The complaint asserts the following claims:
Count I breach of contract
Count II account stated
Count III unjust enrichment
Count IV statutory embezzlement
Count V injunctive relief
In broad terms, Clarity says that defendants acted as a "payment administrator" and managed the relationship between Clarity, a temporary staffing agency, and Spectrum Health System (Spectrum),1 a hospital, under which Clarity provided staff to Spectrum. Spectrum would pay defendants for Clarity's staffing services and defendants in turn would pay Clarity. Clarity says that defendants have failed to pay them for services rendered to Spectrum and have wrongfully withheld the funds to which Clarity is entitled. The amounts Clarity says are unpaid are reflected in 17 invoices.
Before the Court is Clarity's motion for summary judgment on its claims for breach of contract, account stated, and statutory embezzlement. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted on plaintiff's breach of contract claim. A judgment will be entered in favor of Clarity and against defendants in the amount of $448,699.55. Clarity shall submit a proposed judgment.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Clarity also sued Spectrum Health System but later voluntarily dismissed all claims against them (Counts VI — IX). See Doc. 9.
Source: Leagle
