FRANKS v. COLVIN, 13-13073. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20140825893
Visitors: 19
Filed: Aug. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2014
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 12); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 9); AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 11) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. On July 31, 2014, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation addressing the outstanding motions in this action. (ECF No. 12). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Cour
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER: (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 12); (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 9); AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 11) PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge. On July 31, 2014, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation addressing the outstanding motions in this action. (ECF No. 12). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court..
More
OPINION AND ORDER:
(1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 12);
(2) DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 9); AND (3) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 11)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
On July 31, 2014, Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris issued a Report and Recommendation addressing the outstanding motions in this action. (ECF No. 12). In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 9). Further, the Magistrate Judge recommends that this Court grant Defendant's motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 11).
Having thoroughly reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment and the record as a whole, and there being no timely objections from either party pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court will adopt the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12), GRANTS Defendant Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 11), DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 9), and DISMISSES this action with PREJUDICE.
This Order closes this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
