Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

LEE v. LI, 14-11722. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20151110g49 Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Lee's self-styled and rambling Motion to Show Cause, Amended Supplemental Pleadings, and Request for Marshals to Serve Co-Defendants [Doc. #39]. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I will liberally construe this motion as (1) a request for Marshal's service, and (2) a response to Defendant Sai Li's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. #32]. There is no basis to issue an order to show cause to anyon
More

ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Lee's self-styled and rambling Motion to Show Cause, Amended Supplemental Pleadings, and Request for Marshals to Serve Co-Defendants [Doc. #39].

Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I will liberally construe this motion as (1) a request for Marshal's service, and (2) a response to Defendant Sai Li's motion for judgment on the pleadings [Doc. #32]. There is no basis to issue an order to show cause to anyone.

Defendant Eli Lilly Corporate Center has been dismissed. Sai Li is the only remaining Defendant. He has been served, and has filed a dispositive motion. There are no Defendants to be served; therefore, the motion for Marshal's service [Doc. #32] is DENIED.

Plaintiff's motion will nevertheless be considered in assessing Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer