Richard v. LA Dep't Children & Family Services, 2:18-CV-01257. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20190731794
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jul. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES D. CAIN, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 30] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss [doc. 22] be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, with plaintiff's claims
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES D. CAIN, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 30] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss [doc. 22] be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, with plaintiff's claims r..
More
JUDGMENT
JAMES D. CAIN, JR., District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 30] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss [doc. 22] be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, with plaintiff's claims relating to the alleged denials of promotions in 2015 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as prescribed under the LEDL and unexhausted under Title VII, and that the motion be DENIED in all other respects.
Source: Leagle
