Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BROWN v. ORLANS ASSOCIATES, P.C., 13-11086. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20130603945 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 31, 2013
Latest Update: May 31, 2013
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER AT A SESSION of said Court, held in the United States Courthouse, in the City of Port Huron, State of Michigan, on May 31, 2013 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge. On April 12, 2013, this Court dismissed Plaintiff's cause of action. On April 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Rule 12(f) to Strike Defendants Response Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 602 ("Motion for
More

OPINION AND ORDER

AT A SESSION of said Court, held in the United States Courthouse, in the City of Port Huron, State of Michigan, on May 31, 2013

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF, District Judge.

On April 12, 2013, this Court dismissed Plaintiff's cause of action. On April 15, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Judicial Notice Pursuant to Rule 12(f) to Strike Defendants Response Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 602 ("Motion for Judicial Notice") (Docket #8).

As Plaintiff's cause of action had been dismissed on April 12, 2013, there was no pending cause of action (i.e., case or controversy) pending before the Court on April 15, 2013. In the absence of a pending case or controversy, the motion filed by Plaintiff is moot. Therefore, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motion for Judicial Notice (Docket #8).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer