Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HARDY v. SCUTT, 11-CV-13072-DT. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20150224b98 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on February 23, 2015 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Chief Judge GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge. This Section 1983 prisoner civil rights matter having come before the Court on the February 5, 2015 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub recommending that
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on February 23, 2015

PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Chief Judge

GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief District Judge.

This Section 1983 prisoner civil rights matter having come before the Court on the February 5, 2015 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub recommending that the Court grant the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Karen Ibarra, R.N. and Corizon Health, Inc.;1 and no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation having been timely filed; and the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Court's entire file of this action, and having concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Defendants' motion for summary judgment should be granted and this case should, accordingly, be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice; and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises,

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of February 5, 2015 [Dkt. # 71] be, and hereby is, ADOPTED by this Court. Accordingly,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendants Karen Ibarra, R.N. and Corizon Health, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 65] be, and hereby is, GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Request for an Independent Examination by an Eye-Care Expert [Dkt. # 58] and his Motion to Compel Discovery [Dkt #. 63] are DENIED, AS MOOT.

Defendants Ibarra and Corizon Health being the only remaining defendants in this action,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint be, and hereby is, DISMISSED in its entirety.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, based on the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation of February 5, 2015, as well as her previous R&Rs of May 7, 2012 [Dkt. # 30] and April 16, 2014 [Dkt. # 54], this Court certifies that any appeal by Plaintiff would be frivolous and not in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

FootNotes


1. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiffs' claims against all of the other named defendants. [See Dkt. Nos. 34, 62.] Only the claims against Defendants Ibarra and Corizon Health remain at issue in this action.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer