U.S. v. BRYANT, 12-6283. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120531169
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 31, 2012
Latest Update: May 31, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Keith E. Bryant appeals the district court orders denying his motion for appointment of counsel and for DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. 3600 (2006), and for reconsideration of these demands. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bryant, No. 1:95-cr-00202-CCB-3 (D. Md. Dec. 15, 2010; Jan. 19, 2012). We dispense wit
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Keith E. Bryant appeals the district court orders denying his motion for appointment of counsel and for DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. 3600 (2006), and for reconsideration of these demands. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bryant, No. 1:95-cr-00202-CCB-3 (D. Md. Dec. 15, 2010; Jan. 19, 2012). We dispense with..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Keith E. Bryant appeals the district court orders denying his motion for appointment of counsel and for DNA testing under 18 U.S.C. § 3600 (2006), and for reconsideration of these demands. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bryant, No. 1:95-cr-00202-CCB-3 (D. Md. Dec. 15, 2010; Jan. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
