SHLIKAS v. ARROW FINANCIAL SERVICES, 12-1043. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120801073
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 01, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward G. Shlikas appeals from the district court's orders entering judgment in favor of the Defendants on his civil action and denying, in part, his motion for attorney fees and costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shlikas v. Arrow Fin. Servs., No. 1:06-cv-02106-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 17, 2007; June 5, 2008; May 4, 2009; Aug.
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edward G. Shlikas appeals from the district court's orders entering judgment in favor of the Defendants on his civil action and denying, in part, his motion for attorney fees and costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shlikas v. Arrow Fin. Servs., No. 1:06-cv-02106-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 17, 2007; June 5, 2008; May 4, 2009; Aug. ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Edward G. Shlikas appeals from the district court's orders entering judgment in favor of the Defendants on his civil action and denying, in part, his motion for attorney fees and costs. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shlikas v. Arrow Fin. Servs., No. 1:06-cv-02106-WDQ (D. Md. Nov. 17, 2007; June 5, 2008; May 4, 2009; Aug. 26, 2010; Nov. 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
