Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Savage v. Dugal, 17-11263-WGY. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts Number: infdco20190411916 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG , District Judge . The renewed motion for judgment as matter of law, for a new trial, or to alter the judgment is DENIED. The jury verdict was quite logical, well-informed, and justified by the evidence. Here Savage failed to carry his burden of proof that Dugal arrested him without probable cause. Logically the verdict was for Dugal on the Section 1983 and cognate Massachusetts civil right claims. "In a false arrest claim [,however,] where an arrest is effected wit
More

ORDER

The renewed motion for judgment as matter of law, for a new trial, or to alter the judgment is DENIED.

The jury verdict was quite logical, well-informed, and justified by the evidence. Here Savage failed to carry his burden of proof that Dugal arrested him without probable cause. Logically the verdict was for Dugal on the Section 1983 and cognate Massachusetts civil right claims.

"In a false arrest claim [,however,] where an arrest is effected without a warrant [as was undisputed here], it is indeed the defendant's burden to prove a justification." Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Trans. Authy., 437 Mass. 396, 409 (2002) (Cowin, J.) (collecting cases) (emphasis supplied). Here Dugal failed to carry that burden. The jury was properly so instructed. Its verdict and the subsequent judgment on the false imprisonment claim stands.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer