FASANO v. BANK, 13-cv-13124-IT. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20150618911
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . On May 6, 2015, counsel of record for Defendant Dan O'Brien ("O'Brien") filed a Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel [#57]. On May 29, 2015, the court ordered counsel to file a certificate of service indicating that both the motion to withdraw and the court's order had been served on O'Brien. See Order [#75]. The court's order gave O'Brien fourteen days from the date of service to file any objections to counsel's motion. Id. Defendants subse
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . On May 6, 2015, counsel of record for Defendant Dan O'Brien ("O'Brien") filed a Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel [#57]. On May 29, 2015, the court ordered counsel to file a certificate of service indicating that both the motion to withdraw and the court's order had been served on O'Brien. See Order [#75]. The court's order gave O'Brien fourteen days from the date of service to file any objections to counsel's motion. Id. Defendants subseq..
More
ORDER
INDIRA TALWANI, District Judge.
On May 6, 2015, counsel of record for Defendant Dan O'Brien ("O'Brien") filed a Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel [#57]. On May 29, 2015, the court ordered counsel to file a certificate of service indicating that both the motion to withdraw and the court's order had been served on O'Brien. See Order [#75]. The court's order gave O'Brien fourteen days from the date of service to file any objections to counsel's motion. Id.
Defendants subsequently filed a certificate of service showing that O'Brien was served on June 1, 2015. See Certificates Service Pursuant the Court's May 29, 2015 Order, 2 [#76]. No opposition was filed by June 15, 2015.
Accordingly, counsel's Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel [#57] is ALLOWED. Because no notice of replacement counsel has been filed, the clerk is ordered to indicate on the docket that O'Brien is proceeding pro se.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
