HIRSHAUER v. ROSS, 15-2109. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20160119112
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2016
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Shirley A. Hirshauer, James A. Gerben, Jr., Randy W. Gerben, and Jason W. Gerben appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hirshauer v. Ross, No. 1:15-cv-00832-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument becau
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . Shirley A. Hirshauer, James A. Gerben, Jr., Randy W. Gerben, and Jason W. Gerben appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hirshauer v. Ross, No. 1:15-cv-00832-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument becaus..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Shirley A. Hirshauer, James A. Gerben, Jr., Randy W. Gerben, and Jason W. Gerben appeal the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hirshauer v. Ross, No. 1:15-cv-00832-CCB (D. Md. Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
