Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN , District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants Zanders, Sanders, Wilkes, Esmail, Alston, Ritter, and Inman's partial motion to dismiss, (doc. no. 53), GRANTS Defendant Syribeys's motion to
Summary: ORDER DUDLEY H. BOWEN , District Judge . After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants Zanders, Sanders, Wilkes, Esmail, Alston, Ritter, and Inman's partial motion to dismiss, (doc. no. 53), GRANTS Defendant Syribeys's motion to ..
More
ORDER
DUDLEY H. BOWEN, District Judge.
After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants Zanders, Sanders, Wilkes, Esmail, Alston, Ritter, and Inman's partial motion to dismiss, (doc. no. 53), GRANTS Defendant Syribeys's motion to dismiss, (doc. no. 63), and DISMISSES Defendants Zanders, Sanders, Esmail, Inman, and Syribeys from this case.
Defendants Gilbert, Wilkes, Alston, and Ritter shall have fourteen days following entry of this Order within which to answer, move, or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's amended complaint. After the filing of the first answer of a Defendant, the Court will enter a scheduling notice setting case deadlines.
SO ORDERED.
