KERR v. JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY, 11-2111. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120514076
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 14, 2012
Latest Update: May 14, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Douglas Kerr, M.D., Ph.D., appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Kerr v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. 1:10-cv-03294-BEL (D. Md. Sept. 12, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materia
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Douglas Kerr, M.D., Ph.D., appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Kerr v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. 1:10-cv-03294-BEL (D. Md. Sept. 12, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Kerr, M.D., Ph.D., appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Kerr v. Johns Hopkins Univ., No. 1:10-cv-03294-BEL (D. Md. Sept. 12, 2011) We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
