Sanborn v. DentalOne Partners, Inc., 2:17-cv-875. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180427a97
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the United States Magistrate Judge's April 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that failure to object within fourteen days would result in a waiver of review. The time period for objections has run, and no party has objected. Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Report
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the United States Magistrate Judge's April 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that failure to object within fourteen days would result in a waiver of review. The time period for objections has run, and no party has objected. Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Report ..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the United States Magistrate Judge's April 6, 2018 Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that failure to object within fourteen days would result in a waiver of review. The time period for objections has run, and no party has objected. Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18). For the reasons set forth in that document, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 11) and REMANDS this action to the Franklin County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas. The Court declines to award Plaintiff attorney fees and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
