Herrick v. Montejano, 2:19-CV-397-DBH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20191009963
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON MOTIONS TO STAY PROCEEDINGS D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . The motions to stay proceedings are GRANTED. In her motion to remand (joined by the plaintiff and other defendants except Montejano), the defendant Demers has raised a substantial question about this Court's subject matter jurisdiction over the removed Complaint. I therefore STAY all proceedings until the motion to remand is resolved. Briefing shall continue on the motion to remand. I understand that the defendant M
Summary: ORDER ON MOTIONS TO STAY PROCEEDINGS D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . The motions to stay proceedings are GRANTED. In her motion to remand (joined by the plaintiff and other defendants except Montejano), the defendant Demers has raised a substantial question about this Court's subject matter jurisdiction over the removed Complaint. I therefore STAY all proceedings until the motion to remand is resolved. Briefing shall continue on the motion to remand. I understand that the defendant Mo..
More
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
The motions to stay proceedings are GRANTED. In her motion to remand (joined by the plaintiff and other defendants except Montejano), the defendant Demers has raised a substantial question about this Court's subject matter jurisdiction over the removed Complaint. I therefore STAY all proceedings until the motion to remand is resolved. Briefing shall continue on the motion to remand. I understand that the defendant Montejano would prefer that briefing proceed simultaneously on her motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings. But unless I first determine that this federal court has subject matter jurisdiction, I will not reach those issues.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
