WILSON v. FOOT LOCKER, INC., 15-10984. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20150604b38
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD'S MAY 5, 2015 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 7) AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (ECF NO. 2) PAUL D. BORMAN , District Judge . On May 5, 2015, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford issued a Report and Recommendation to Deny Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 7, Report and Recommendation; ECF No. 2, Motion to Remand.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no tim
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD'S MAY 5, 2015 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 7) AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (ECF NO. 2) PAUL D. BORMAN , District Judge . On May 5, 2015, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford issued a Report and Recommendation to Deny Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 7, Report and Recommendation; ECF No. 2, Motion to Remand.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no time..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD'S MAY 5, 2015 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 7) AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (ECF NO. 2)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
On May 5, 2015, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford issued a Report and Recommendation to Deny Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 7, Report and Recommendation; ECF No. 2, Motion to Remand.) Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L. R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's Motion to Remand.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. On March 25, 2015, the Court emailed counsel and instructed that all future filings should bear only the initials of the minor child. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a)(3). The parties are instructed to use only the initials of the minor in all future filings. Filings failing to comply with this directive will be stricken.
Source: Leagle
