SIMMONS v. WAYNE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, 11-CV-14936. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20120810861
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JULY 13, 2012, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge. On July 13, 2012, Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in which he recommends that the court deem plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal [docket entry 11] to be moot and that the court grant defendant's motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief [docket entry 19]. Neither party has objected to the R&R and the time for doing so has e
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JULY 13, 2012, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge. On July 13, 2012, Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in which he recommends that the court deem plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal [docket entry 11] to be moot and that the court grant defendant's motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief [docket entry 19]. Neither party has objected to the R&R and the time for doing so has ex..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S JULY 13, 2012, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge.
On July 13, 2012, Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") in which he recommends that the court deem plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal [docket entry 11] to be moot and that the court grant defendant's motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief [docket entry 19]. Neither party has objected to the R&R and the time for doing so has expired. The court agrees with the magistrate judge's analysis and recommendations. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Komives' July 13, 2012, R&R is hereby accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal [docket entry 11] is denied as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion for leave to file a sur-reply brief [docket entry 19] is granted.
Source: Leagle
