Jordan v. Commissioner of Social Security, 17-13636. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20190215a61
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [16]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [12]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [14] ARTHUR J. TARNOW , District Judge . Plaintiff Serenity Jordan seeks judicial review of an Administrative Law Judge's decision denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [12] on March 29, 2018. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [14] on May 9, 2018. Plaintiff filed a Re
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [16]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [12]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [14] ARTHUR J. TARNOW , District Judge . Plaintiff Serenity Jordan seeks judicial review of an Administrative Law Judge's decision denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [12] on March 29, 2018. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [14] on May 9, 2018. Plaintiff filed a Rep..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [16]; DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [12]; AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [14]
ARTHUR J. TARNOW, District Judge.
Plaintiff Serenity Jordan seeks judicial review of an Administrative Law Judge's decision denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [12] on March 29, 2018. Defendant filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [14] on May 9, 2018. Plaintiff filed a Reply [15] on May 24, 2018.
On January 28, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report & Recommendation [16] ("R&R") recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff's Motion [12] and grant Defendant's Motion [14]. Neither party has filed any objection to the R&R.
The Court having reviewed the record, the R&R [16] is hereby ADOPTED and entered as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [12] is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [14] is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
