DANFORTH v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, 12-cv-10159. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20130711a53
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated June 20, 2013 [docket entry 68], in which he recommends that the Court grant plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) [docket entry 66]. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the R&R pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court had an opportunity to fully review this
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated June 20, 2013 [docket entry 68], in which he recommends that the Court grant plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) [docket entry 66]. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the R&R pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court had an opportunity to fully review this ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated June 20, 2013 [docket entry 68], in which he recommends that the Court grant plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) [docket entry 66]. Plaintiff has not filed an objection to the R&R pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).
The Court had an opportunity to fully review this matter and believes that the magistrate judge reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge David R. Grand's Report and Recommendation dated June 20, 2013, is hereby accepted and adopted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for voluntary dismissal is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the PHS defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint is denied as moot [docket entry 60].
Source: Leagle
