GLADDEN v. McHUGH, 12-1468. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120824087
Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Warren K. Gladden appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gladden v. McHugh, No. 8:10-cv-03402-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Warren K. Gladden appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gladden v. McHugh, No. 8:10-cv-03402-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials b..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Warren K. Gladden appeals the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action as untimely. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gladden v. McHugh, No. 8:10-cv-03402-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 13, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
