Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DREW v. ENTERPRISE LEASING OF DETROIT, LLC, 13-CV-11460. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20150318d94 Visitors: 23
Filed: Mar. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED FEBRUARY 27, 2015 (Dkt. 38), (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT ENTERPRISE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 23), and (3) DISMISSING DEFENDANT ENTERPRISE FROM THE CASE MARK A. GOLDSMITH , District Judge . This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen, issued on February 27, 2015. In the R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant Enterpris
More

ORDER (1) ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED FEBRUARY 27, 2015 (Dkt. 38), (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT ENTERPRISE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. 23), and (3) DISMISSING DEFENDANT ENTERPRISE FROM THE CASE

This matter is presently before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen, issued on February 27, 2015. In the R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant Enterprise Leasing of Detroit, LLC's ("Enterprise") motion to dismiss be granted and Defendant Enterprise be dismissed from the case. The parties have not filed objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Court has reviewed the R&R and concludes that the Magistrate Judge has reached the proper conclusion for the proper reasons. Therefore, the R&R is accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Defendant Enterprise's motion to dismiss is granted (Dkt. 23) and the claims against Defendant Enterprise are dismissed with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer