U.S. v. RUSSELL, 2:14cr00228-01. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20160418479
Visitors: 26
Filed: Mar. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT PATRICIA MINALDI , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc. 45) previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, and a de novo determination of the issues, including consideration of the Notice of Insanity Defense (Rec. Doc. 46), the Government's Response (Rec. Doc. 47), and the Minutes of the Status Conference (Rec. Doc. 49), having determined that the findings are correct under applicable
Summary: JUDGMENT PATRICIA MINALDI , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc. 45) previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, and a de novo determination of the issues, including consideration of the Notice of Insanity Defense (Rec. Doc. 46), the Government's Response (Rec. Doc. 47), and the Minutes of the Status Conference (Rec. Doc. 49), having determined that the findings are correct under applicable l..
More
JUDGMENT
PATRICIA MINALDI, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Rec. Doc. 45) previously filed herein and after an independent review of the record, and a de novo determination of the issues, including consideration of the Notice of Insanity Defense (Rec. Doc. 46), the Government's Response (Rec. Doc. 47), and the Minutes of the Status Conference (Rec. Doc. 49), having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law; it is
ORDERED that the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED and the defendant, James Arthur Russell, is competent to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him and properly able to assist in his defense.
Source: Leagle
