Gencyuz v. Commissioner of Social Security, 18-CV-11397. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180521809
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 18, 2018
Latest Update: May 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN , Senior District Judge . This matter is presently before the Court on the report and recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford, who recommends that the Court deny plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). Plaintiff has not objected to the R&R and the time for her to do so has expired. The Court has reviewed plaintiff's IFP application and agrees with Magist
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN , Senior District Judge . This matter is presently before the Court on the report and recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford, who recommends that the Court deny plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). Plaintiff has not objected to the R&R and the time for her to do so has expired. The Court has reviewed plaintiff's IFP application and agrees with Magistr..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN, Senior District Judge.
This matter is presently before the Court on the report and recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford, who recommends that the Court deny plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). Plaintiff has not objected to the R&R and the time for her to do so has expired. The Court has reviewed plaintiff's IFP application and agrees with Magistrate Judge Stafford's recommendation because plaintiff indicates she receives income from rent payments, interest, or dividends but did not disclose the amount. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Stafford's R&R is hereby accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's IFP application is denied. Within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff must either submit a complete IFP application or pay the filing fee. Otherwise, the Court shall dismiss the complaint.
Source: Leagle
