Parker v. City of Highland Park, 18-cv-12038. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20200210c22
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER CLARIFYING OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On January 31, 2020, the Court entered an Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' motion to dismiss. ( See Op. and Order, ECF No. 46.) The Court clarifies that, for the reasons stated on pages 8-10 of the Opinion and Order ( see id., PageID.607-609), but inadvertently omitted from page 23 of the Opinion and Order ( see id.,
Summary: ORDER CLARIFYING OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On January 31, 2020, the Court entered an Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' motion to dismiss. ( See Op. and Order, ECF No. 46.) The Court clarifies that, for the reasons stated on pages 8-10 of the Opinion and Order ( see id., PageID.607-609), but inadvertently omitted from page 23 of the Opinion and Order ( see id., ..
More
ORDER CLARIFYING OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, District Judge.
On January 31, 2020, the Court entered an Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants' motion to dismiss. (See Op. and Order, ECF No. 46.) The Court clarifies that, for the reasons stated on pages 8-10 of the Opinion and Order (see id., PageID.607-609), but inadvertently omitted from page 23 of the Opinion and Order (see id., PageID.622), Plaintiff's unlawful seizure claim against the Defendants is DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
