Goldfarb v. Home Depot (U.S.A), Inc., 18-10278. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180810a07
Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on August 9, 2018, (1) Defendant's motion to compel Plaintiff's deposition prior to Plaintiff's Rule 34 inspection [Doc. #19] is DENIED; (2) Plaintiff's motion for protective order and to stay Plaintiff's deposition [Doc. #21] is GRANTED; and (3) Plaintiff's motion to compel entry onto land for inspection [Doc. #22] is GRANTED. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff's expert, along with counsel
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on August 9, 2018, (1) Defendant's motion to compel Plaintiff's deposition prior to Plaintiff's Rule 34 inspection [Doc. #19] is DENIED; (2) Plaintiff's motion for protective order and to stay Plaintiff's deposition [Doc. #21] is GRANTED; and (3) Plaintiff's motion to compel entry onto land for inspection [Doc. #22] is GRANTED. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff's expert, along with counsel,..
More
ORDER
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on August 9, 2018,
(1) Defendant's motion to compel Plaintiff's deposition prior to Plaintiff's Rule 34 inspection [Doc. #19] is DENIED;
(2) Plaintiff's motion for protective order and to stay Plaintiff's deposition [Doc. #21] is GRANTED; and
(3) Plaintiff's motion to compel entry onto land for inspection [Doc. #22] is GRANTED.
The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff's expert, along with counsel, will conduct the inspection prior to the Plaintiff's deposition.
The Plaintiff will produce his answers to Defendant's interrogatories and requests to produce prior to the inspection.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
