USA ex rel Michael S. Lord v. North American Partners In Anesthesia, LLP, 3:13-2940. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20171115e95
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION , District Judge . Based on the foregoing memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. NAPA defendants' motion to dismiss, (Doc. 52 ), relator's claims in his complaint, (Doc. 26 ), against them is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 2. NAPA defendants' motion to partially dismiss Counts I and II based on relator's FCA claims regarding alleged wrongdoing before June 2011 and after June — is GRANTED, and the claims outside of the stated dates are DISMISSED
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION , District Judge . Based on the foregoing memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. NAPA defendants' motion to dismiss, (Doc. 52 ), relator's claims in his complaint, (Doc. 26 ), against them is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 2. NAPA defendants' motion to partially dismiss Counts I and II based on relator's FCA claims regarding alleged wrongdoing before June 2011 and after June — is GRANTED, and the claims outside of the stated dates are DISMISSED ..
More
ORDER
MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge.
Based on the foregoing memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. NAPA defendants' motion to dismiss, (Doc. 52), relator's claims in his complaint, (Doc. 26), against them is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;
2. NAPA defendants' motion to partially dismiss Counts I and II based on relator's FCA claims regarding alleged wrongdoing before June 2011 and after June — is GRANTED, and the claims outside of the stated dates are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
3. NAPA defendants' motion to partially dismiss Counts I and II based on relator's FCA claims regarding his Examination Allegations and his Informed Consent Allegations is GRANTED, and these claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
4. NAPA defendants' motion to dismiss relator's FCA claims in Counts I and II regarding his allegations that NAPA anesthesiologists were not immediately available is DENIED, and these claims will PROCEED;
5. NAPA defendants' motion to dismiss relator's FCA claims in Counts I and II regarding his allegations that NAPA anesthesiologists pre-signed attestations is DENIED, and these claims will PROCEED;
6. NAPA defendants' motion to dismiss Counts IV, V, and VI of relator's complaint, (Doc. 26), is DISMISSED AS MOOT;
7. NAPA defendants are directed to file their answer to the remaining claims against them in relator's complaint on or before November 30. 2017.
Source: Leagle
