ASARIDIS v. WEINSTEIN, 14-cv-10417-IT. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20140723c08
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jul. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI, District Judge. Having also reviewed the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation [#41] and there similarly being no objections filed, this court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [#20] is DENIED because neither Chase nor Bank of America ("the banks") was properly served with process. Defendant FIA Card Services, N.A.'s Motion for Leave to File [#26] is DENIED AS MOOT because the banks may file r
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI, District Judge. Having also reviewed the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation [#41] and there similarly being no objections filed, this court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [#20] is DENIED because neither Chase nor Bank of America ("the banks") was properly served with process. Defendant FIA Card Services, N.A.'s Motion for Leave to File [#26] is DENIED AS MOOT because the banks may file re..
More
ORDER
INDIRA TALWANI, District Judge.
Having also reviewed the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation [#41] and there similarly being no objections filed, this court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the recommendation. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [#20] is DENIED because neither Chase nor Bank of America ("the banks") was properly served with process. Defendant FIA Card Services, N.A.'s Motion for Leave to File [#26] is DENIED AS MOOT because the banks may file responsive pleadings after they are properly served. Plaintiffs shall complete service of process no later than August 18, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
