CHUNG VUE XIONG v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, 13-3128 (DWF/JSM). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20140627b57
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated June 4, 2014 (Doc. No. 15). No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge. The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated June 4, 2014 (Doc. No. 15). No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated June 4, 2014 (Doc. No. 15). No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:
ORDER
1. Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron's June 4, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [15]) is ADOPTED.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. No. [4]) is GRANTED.
3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
