Judds Brothers Construction v. Mersino Dewatering Inc., 8:16CV1. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20181227791
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY EXHIBITS. SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED LAURIE SMITH CAMP , Senior District Judge . Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), counsel for the plaintiff shall either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14 calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed: (Plaintiff's exhibit numbers 1-12) / Motion Hearing/April 13, 2017) If counsel fails to withdraw the
Summary: ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY EXHIBITS. SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED LAURIE SMITH CAMP , Senior District Judge . Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), counsel for the plaintiff shall either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14 calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed: (Plaintiff's exhibit numbers 1-12) / Motion Hearing/April 13, 2017) If counsel fails to withdraw thes..
More
ORDER TO WITHDRAW EXHIBITS OR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY EXHIBITS. SHOULD NOT BE DESTROYED
LAURIE SMITH CAMP, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to NECivR 79.1(f) or NECrimR 55.1(g), counsel for the plaintiff shall either 1) withdraw the following exhibits previously submitted in this matter within 14 calendar days of the date of this order, or 2) show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed:
(Plaintiff's exhibit numbers 1-12) / Motion Hearing/April 13, 2017)
If counsel fails to withdraw these exhibits as directed or to show cause why the exhibits should not be destroyed, the clerk's office is directed to destroy the listed exhibits without further notice to the parties or order from the court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
