Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

INTREPID SHIP MANAGEMENT, INC. v. PLANT RECOVERY COMPANY, 3:12-CV-243. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Texas Number: infdco20160418461 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2016
Summary: ORDER AND OPINION ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GEORGE C. HANKS, Jr. , District Judge . The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner (Dkt. 231). Pending before Judge Froeschner were two Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc. ("Malin") (Dkt. 168, 169). On February 12, 2016, Judge Froeschner filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that these motions for
More

ORDER AND OPINION ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation by the United States Magistrate Judge John R. Froeschner (Dkt. 231).

Pending before Judge Froeschner were two Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Malin International Ship Repair & Drydock, Inc. ("Malin") (Dkt. 168, 169). On February 12, 2016, Judge Froeschner filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that these motions for summary judgment be denied.

No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court reviews the Memorandum and Recommendation for plain error on the face of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also, FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).

Based on the pleadings, the record and the applicable law, the Court finds that there is no plain error apparent from the face of the record. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) Judge Froeschner's Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 231) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED in its entirety as the holding of the Court; and (2) Malin's motions for summary judgment Dkt. 168 and 169 are hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer